Amerlon Realty Corp. v. Reder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amerlon Realty Corp. v. Reder

50 A.D.2d 587, 375 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 587 (Amerlon Realty Corp. v. Reder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amerlon Realty Corp. v. Reder, 50 A.D.2d 587, 375 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent board of zoning appeals which, after a hearing, denied an application to amend a basement plan in connection with an existing two-family house so as to permit the maintenance of a full bathroom in the basement, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 19, 1975, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The record of the hearing before the respondent board sustains its findings; the board was justified in its denial of petitioner’s application (see Matter of Midgett v Schermerhorn, 24 AD2d 572; Banos v Colborn, 35 AD2d 281). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent board of zoning appeals which, after a hearing, denied an application to amend a basement plan in connection with an existing two-family house so as to permit the maintenance of a full bathroom in the basement, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 19, 1975, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The record of the hearing before the respondent board sustains its findings; the board was justified in its denial of petitioner’s application (see Matter of Midgett v Schermerhorn, 24 AD2d 572; Banos v Colborn, 35 AD2d 281). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 587, 375 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amerlon-realty-corp-v-reder-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack