Amerivest Financial Group, Inc. v. Huntco of Marco, Inc.

503 So. 2d 999, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1198·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the trial court granting appellee’s motion to transfer the venue of this case to Collier County.

From our study of the briefs and record we conclude that appellee did not carry its burden of demonstrating that the venue chosen by appellant was improper. Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, 243 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Appellant, or plaintiff in this case, was entitled in the first instance to choose the venue of the case and it was incumbent upon appellee, as defendant, to show that it had the privilege to be sued elsewhere. Appellee has not made the required showing.

[1000] Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amerivest Financial Group, Inc. v. Huntco of Marco, Inc., 503 So. 2d 999, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

503 So. 2d 999 (Amerivest Financial Group, Inc. v. Huntco of Marco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence
243 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)