Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc.
734 N.W.2d 216, 2007 WL 2045076
This text of 734 N.W.2d 216 (Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc., 734 N.W.2d 216, 2007 WL 2045076 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant-Appellee,
v.
CAREY TRANSPORTATION, INC., and Diane Carey, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Gerri Thomas, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Gerald Thomas, Trailer X-Press, Inc., and Phoenix Insurance Group, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trial Lawyers Association of Wayne County Juvenile Court v. Chief Judge, Third Judicial Circuit Court
734 N.W.2d 216 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
734 N.W.2d 216, 2007 WL 2045076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amerisure-mutual-insurance-company-v-carey-transportation-inc-mich-2007.