Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc.

734 N.W.2d 207, 479 Mich. 851
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 18, 2007
Docket133196
StatusPublished

This text of 734 N.W.2d 207 (Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Carey Transportation, Inc., 734 N.W.2d 207, 479 Mich. 851 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

734 N.W.2d 207 (2007)

AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant-Appellee,
v.
CAREY TRANSPORTATION, INC., and Diane Carey, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Gerri Thomas, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Gerald Thomas, Trailer X-Press, Inc., and Phoenix Insurance Group, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 133196. COA No. 270339.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 18, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
734 N.W.2d 207, 479 Mich. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amerisure-mutual-insurance-company-v-carey-transpo-mich-2007.