American Woodland Indus., Inc. v. Tolson

579 S.E.2d 282, 357 N.C. 61
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 27, 2003·No. No. 073P03·Published

Opinion

1. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COAOl-1533)

2. Defs’ (Secretary of Revenue and State of NC) Conditional PDR as to Additional Issues

3. Defs’ (Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Gates, Graham, Granville, Green, Guilford, Halifax, Harnett, Haywood, Henderson, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Iredell, Jackson, Johnston, Jones, Lee, Lenoir, Lincoln, Macon, Martin, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Mitchell, Montgomery, Moore, Nash, Scotland and Wake Counties) Conditional PDR as to Additional Issues

4. Defs’ (Alamance, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Buncombe, Burke, Cabarrus, Caldwell, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cherokee, Chowan, Clay, Cleveland, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Davidson, Duplin, Durham and Edgecombe Counties) Conditional PDR as to Additional Issues

1. Denied

2. Dismissed as Moot

3. Dismissed as Moot

4. Dismissed as Moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Woodland Indus., Inc. v. Tolson, 579 S.E.2d 282, 357 N.C. 61 (N.C. 2003).

579 S.E.2d 282 (American Woodland Indus., Inc. v. Tolson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31