American Whitewater v. Electron Hydro, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedApril 28, 2021
Docket2:16-cv-00047
StatusUnknown

This text of American Whitewater v. Electron Hydro, LLC (American Whitewater v. Electron Hydro, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Whitewater v. Electron Hydro, LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 AMERICAN WHITEWATER, et al., CASE NOS. C16-0047-JCC; C20-1864-JCC 10 Plaintiffs, 11 ORDER v. 12 ELECTRON HYDRO, LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. There are two cases pending before the 16 Court that pose the same question: whether Electron Hydro, LLC and related parties’ operations 17 and management of a dam on the Puyallup River violated the Endangered Species Act by 18 unlawfully taking threatened and/or endangered species. See Am. Whitewater, et al. v. Electron 19 Hydro, LLC, et al., C16-0047-JCC; Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Electron Hydro, LLC, et al., 20 C20-1864-JCC. 21 Given the similarity of issues and the parties’ stipulated agreement to consolidation of 22 these cases at the April 28, 2021 status conference, (see C16-0047-JCC, Dkt. No. 33; C20-1864- 23 JCC, Dkt. No. 14), the Court concludes that consolidation is proper. The determination is based 24 on a consideration of the interests of justice, expeditious results, conservation of resources, 25 avoiding inconsistent results, and the potential of prejudice. See Inv’rs Rsch. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. 26 for Cent. Dist. of Cal., 877 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1989); see also Adams Apple, Inc. v. Central 1 Washington Bank, 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir. 1987) (“[T]rial courts may consolidate cases 2 sua sponte.”). 3 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that the following cases be consolidated: 4 American Whitewater, et al. v. Electron Hydro, LLC, et al., C16-0047-JCC and Puyallup Tribe 5 of Indians v. Electron Hydro, LLC, et al., C20-1864-JCC. All future filings shall bear the caption 6 and case number of the first-filed case, American Whitewater, et al. v. Electron Hydro, LLC, et 7 al., C16-0047-JCC. 8 The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to administratively close the remaining case, Puyallup 9 Tribe of Indians v. Electron Hydro, LLC, et al., C20-1864-JCC. 10 The parties shall file all future documents related to either case in Case No. C16-0047- 11 JCC. All future filings shall include the words “This Document Relates To:” in the caption, 12 followed by either “C16-0047-JCC,” “C20-1864-JCC,” or “Both Cases.” 13 The Court VACATES the July 26, 2021 bench trial in American Whitewater, C16-0047- 14 JCC, (Dkt. No. 29), and ORDERS that the parties comply with the following case management 15 deadlines: 16 • Expert reports served by: August 20, 2021 17 • Rebuttal expert reports served by: September 20, 2021 18 • Discovery cut-off: October 29, 2021 19 • Dispositive motions due: November 19, 2021 20 • Bench trial set for: April 18, 2022 21 DATED this 28th day of April 2021. 22 A 23 24 25 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
American Whitewater v. Electron Hydro, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-whitewater-v-electron-hydro-llc-wawd-2021.