American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw

129 S.E. 910, 34 Ga. App. 457, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 313
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1925
Docket16446
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 910 (American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw, 129 S.E. 910, 34 Ga. App. 457, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 313 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Twice lias this case been before the Supreme Court. See Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 (77 S. E. 577), and Probasco v. Shaw, 144 Ga. 416 (87 S. E. 466). Under the principles announced in those decisions, when applied to the facts on the last trial, no ground of the motion for a new trial shows error that requires a reversal of the judgment. The principles of law involved have been definitely-settled by the foregoing decisions; and as the evidence on the last trial is sufficient to support the verdict then rendered, the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Probasco
77 S.E. 577 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Probasco v. Shaw
87 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 910, 34 Ga. App. 457, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-trust-banking-co-v-shaw-gactapp-1925.