American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw
This text of 129 S.E. 910 (American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Twice lias this case been before the Supreme Court. See Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 (77 S. E. 577), and Probasco v. Shaw, 144 Ga. 416 (87 S. E. 466). Under the principles announced in those decisions, when applied to the facts on the last trial, no ground of the motion for a new trial shows error that requires a reversal of the judgment. The principles of law involved have been definitely-settled by the foregoing decisions; and as the evidence on the last trial is sufficient to support the verdict then rendered, the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 S.E. 910, 34 Ga. App. 457, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-trust-banking-co-v-shaw-gactapp-1925.