American Transit Insurance v. Tagliaferro
This text of 84 A.D.3d 1078 (American Transit Insurance v. Tagliaferro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Thomas Tagliaferro appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Archer, J.H.O.), dated August 2, 2010, which, after a framed-issue hearing, granted the petition and stayed arbitration.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, upon consideration of all of the evidence (see Bolton v Express, 79 AD3d 779, 780 [2010]; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher v Global Nuclear Servs. & Supply, 280 AD2d 360, 361 [2001]; National Bank of N. Am. v Systems Home Improvement, 69 AD2d 557, 562 [1979], affd 50 NY2d 814 [1980]), there was ample proof to sustain the petitioner’s prima facie burden establishing that no accident occurred.
Under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing the appellant’s request to allow a previously undisclosed witness to testify at the hearing (see generally Parlante v Cavallero, 73 AD3d 1001, 1003 [2010]; Laurin Mar. AB v Imperial Chem. Indus., 301 AD2d 367, 368 [2003]).
In view of the foregoing, we need not reach the petitioner’s remaining contention. Prudenti, RJ., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.3d 1078, 922 N.Y.S.2d 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-transit-insurance-v-tagliaferro-nyappdiv-2011.