American Transit Insurance v. Rechev of Brooklyn, Inc.

57 A.D.3d 257, 867 N.Y.2d 914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Although appellant had provided plaintiff with information about the accident shortly after it occurred, in compliance with the policy, she failed to give plaintiff notice of her suit against its insureds until 14 months after the suit was commenced and she had obtained an order for a default judgment. Plaintiff having thus lost its right to appear and interpose an answer, its disclaimer of coverage was proper (see Insurance Law § 3420 [a] [3]; American Tr. Ins. Co. v B.O. Astra Mgt. Corp., 39 AD3d 432 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 802 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Transit Insurance v. Rechev of Brooklyn, Inc., 57 A.D.3d 257, 867 N.Y.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 257 (American Transit Insurance v. Rechev of Brooklyn, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraemer Building Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
136 A.D.3d 1205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Castro v. Prana Associates Twenty One, LP
95 A.D.3d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Vernet v. Eveready Insurance
89 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)