AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY v. Brown

926 N.E.2d 255, 14 N.Y.3d 809, 899 N.Y.S.2d 751
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2010·No. 121, SSM 7·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, defendant Brown’s motion for summary judgment denied, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment granted and judgment granted declaring that plaintiff’s disclaimer of coverage was proper, that it had no obligation to defend or indemnify its insured in the subject underlying action and that it is not responsible for payment of any portion of the judgment rendered therein. Defendant Brown failed to provide a valid excuse for his failure to use reasonable diligence in providing plaintiff insurer with notice of the underlying personal injury action.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY v. Brown, 926 N.E.2d 255, 14 N.Y.3d 809, 899 N.Y.S.2d 751 (N.Y. 2010).

926 N.E.2d 255 (AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

South W. Mar. & Gen. Ins. Co. v. Falls Lake Natl. Ins. Co.
211 A.D.3d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)