American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Melendez

164 N.Y.S.3d 445, 204 A.D.3d 461, 2022 NY Slip Op 02356
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 2022
DocketIndex No. 654871/19 Appeal No. 15704 Case No. 2021-03413
StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.Y.S.3d 445 (American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Melendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Melendez, 164 N.Y.S.3d 445, 204 A.D.3d 461, 2022 NY Slip Op 02356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

American Tr. Ins. Co. v Melendez (2022 NY Slip Op 02356)
American Tr. Ins. Co. v Melendez
2022 NY Slip Op 02356
Decided on April 12, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 12, 2022
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.

Index No. 654871/19 Appeal No. 15704 Case No. 2021-03413

[*1]American Transit Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Louis Melendez, et al., Defendants, Metro Pain Specialists, P.C., et al., Defendants-Appellants.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC, Brooklyn (Maksim Leyvi of counsel), for appellants.



Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered on or about March 2, 2021, declaring that defendants Metro Pain Specialists, P.C. and Right Aid Medical Supply Corp. are not entitled to no-fault benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the judgment vacated.

Plaintiff insurer failed to make a prima facie showing that it complied with the time frames in scheduling defendant Louis Melendez's independent medical examination (IME) as set forth in the no-fault implementing regulations (see American Tr. Ins. Co. v Acosta, 202 AD3d 567 [1st Dept 2022]; American Tr. Ins. Co. v Martinez, 202 AD3d 526 [1st Dept 2022]). Plaintiff did not provide evidence as to when

it received the claims from Metro and Right Aid, and thus failed to establish that it scheduled the IME within the prescribed time frame (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.5[b], [d]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 12, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Acosta
202 A.D.3d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.Y.S.3d 445, 204 A.D.3d 461, 2022 NY Slip Op 02356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-tr-ins-co-v-melendez-nyappdiv-2022.