American Title & Trust Co. v. City of New York

Second Circuit

American Title & Trust Co. v. City of New York

292 F. 860, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

DocketNo. 204

StatusPublished

This text of 292 F. 860 (American Title & Trust Co. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Title & Trust Co. v. City of New York, 292 F. 860, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029 (2d Cir. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

MAYER, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The District Court was without power on any ground to make the order appealed from, so far, in any event, as it affected appellant. The suit is one to quiet title, and proceeds upon theories of general equity jurisprudence. In such circumstances, it cannot be maintained without clear proof, not only of legal title in plaintiff, but also of possession. Frost v. Spitley, 121 U. S. 552, 7 Sup. Ct. 1129, 30 L. Ed. 1010.

Here possession is not asserted, but, on the contrary, appears to-be elsewhere than in plaintiff. We should be inclined to dismiss the complaint as to this appellant, but for the fact that proceedings have been had before a master, and there may have been developments in-the case which are not apparent upon this record. It is sufficient at this time to limit our conclusion strictly to, the order appealed from.

The order is reversed, with costs to Crown Lands Corporation of Staten Island, appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAYER, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The District Court was without power on any ground to make the order appealed from, so far, in any event, as it affected appellant. The suit is one to quiet title, and proceeds upon theories of general equity jurisprudence. In such circumstances, it cannot be maintained without clear proof, not only of legal title in plaintiff, but also of possession. Frost v. Spitley, 121 U. S. 552, 7 Sup. Ct. 1129, 30 L. Ed. 1010.

Here possession is not asserted, but, on the contrary, appears to-be elsewhere than in plaintiff. We should be inclined to dismiss the complaint as to this appellant, but for the fact that proceedings have been had before a master, and there may have been developments in-the case which are not apparent upon this record. It is sufficient at this time to limit our conclusion strictly to, the order appealed from.

The order is reversed, with costs to Crown Lands Corporation of Staten Island, appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 F. 860, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-title-trust-co-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack