Home/Second Circuit/American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

39 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30987
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 4, 1994·No. 762·Published

Opinion

39 F.3d 411

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists
Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture
& UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.

No. 762, Docket 94-7616.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided Nov. 4, 1994.

Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Peter J. McHugh, New York City (Martin Domb, Hill, Betts & Nash, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Leisure. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp., 852 F.Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y.1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation, 39 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30987 (2d Cir. 1994).

39 F.3d 411 (American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp.
852 F. Supp. 221 (S.D. New York, 1994)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp.
39 F.3d 411 (Second Circuit, 1994)