American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

Second Circuit

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

39 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30987

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1994

Docket762

StatusPublished

This text of 39 F.3d 411 (American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation, 39 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30987 (2d Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

39 F.3d 411

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists
Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture
& UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.

No. 762, Docket 94-7616.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided Nov. 4, 1994.

Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Peter J. McHugh, New York City (Martin Domb, Hill, Betts & Nash, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Leisure. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp., 852 F.Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y.1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI