American Tel-A-System, Inc. v. Daniel Ambrose and David Muckerman

38 F.3d 1222, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18033, 1994 WL 466411
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1994
Docket94-1076
StatusPublished

This text of 38 F.3d 1222 (American Tel-A-System, Inc. v. Daniel Ambrose and David Muckerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Tel-A-System, Inc. v. Daniel Ambrose and David Muckerman, 38 F.3d 1222, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18033, 1994 WL 466411 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

38 F.3d 1222
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

AMERICAN TEL-A-SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel AMBROSE and David Muckerman, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-1076.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 14, 1994.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 F.3d 1222, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18033, 1994 WL 466411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-tel-a-system-inc-v-daniel-ambrose-and-dav-cafc-1994.