American Tack Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
This text of 211 F.2d 239 (American Tack Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AMERICAN TACK CO., Inc., et al.
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.
No. 177, Docket 22884.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 11, 1954.
Decided March 24, 1954.
Maurice Gellar, New York City (Rosenbaum & Gellar, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners.
Alan B. Hobbes, Sp. Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. (Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, and Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The cease and desist order which requires the disclosure of the country of origin (Germany) not only as to the products complained of, 'Solid Head Nickel Plated Thumbtacks,' but also as to 'other similar products,' is of usual nature, consistently upheld by the courts. Consumer Sales Corp. v. F.T.C., 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 404, 408, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 912, 73 S.Ct. 335, 97 L.Ed. 703; Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. F.T.D., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 968, 971-972; Haskelite Mfg. Corp. v. F.T.C., 7 Cir., 127 F.2d 765, 766; P. Lorillard Co. v. F.T.C., 4 Cir., 186 F.2d 52, 58-59; Hill v. F.T.C., 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 104, 106; Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. F.T.C., 7 Cir., 142 F.2d 321, 329, certiorari denied 323 U.S. 730, 65 S.Ct. 66, 89 L.Ed. 586.
Order affirmed and enforcement granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 F.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-tack-co-inc-v-federal-trade-commission-ca2-1954.