American Surety Company v. Mildred A. Horton and William E. Horton, Individually, and D.B.A. Horton Funeral Home, Etc.

Sixth Circuit

American Surety Company v. Mildred A. Horton and William E. Horton, Individually, and D.B.A. Horton Funeral Home, Etc.

200 F.2d 557, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2325

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 17, 1952

Docket11553_1

StatusPublished

This text of 200 F.2d 557 (American Surety Company v. Mildred A. Horton and William E. Horton, Individually, and D.B.A. Horton Funeral Home, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Surety Company v. Mildred A. Horton and William E. Horton, Individually, and D.B.A. Horton Funeral Home, Etc., 200 F.2d 557, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2325 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case having been considered on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys;

And it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury; that no error was committed in the charge of the Court but, on the contrary, that the charge clearly required *558 the jury to find bad faith on the part of the appellant insurer in order to justify a verdict for plaintiffs;

And no material error appearing in the conduct of the trial below;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case having been considered on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys;

And it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury; that no error was committed in the charge of the Court but, on the contrary, that the charge clearly required *558 the jury to find bad faith on the part of the appellant insurer in order to justify a verdict for plaintiffs;

And no material error appearing in the conduct of the trial below;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 F.2d 557, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-surety-company-v-mildred-a-horton-and-william-e-horton-ca6-1952.