American Surety Co. v. Loomis

132 Misc. 62, 229 N.Y.S. 62, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Frankenthaler, J.

Even if it be assumed that the town of Babylon and county of Suffolk could validly assign the causes of action which accrued in their favor, it cannot be gainsaid that the receipt of a valuable consideration would be necessary to make the transfer effective. The complaint, however, fails to allege that anything was received in return for the assignment and for aught that appears in that pleading the transfer was a mere gratuity or donation. Applying the rule that any fan, reasonable and substantial doubt as to the power of a municipality must be resolved against its existence, the complaint would, therefore, appear to be insufficient. Its deficiencies cannot be cured by statements in plaintiff's bill of particulars. The contents of a bill of particulars may, it is true — as a result of admissions therein contained — under certain circumstances render an otherwise good complaint bad, but they can never make an otherwise bad complaint good. The motion to dismiss is granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days upon payment of ten dollars costs. Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Surety Co. v. Loomis, 132 Misc. 62, 229 N.Y.S. 62, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).

132 Misc. 62 (American Surety Co. v. Loomis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karom v. Altarac
208 Misc. 919 (New York County Courts, 1955)