American Surety Co. v. Loomis

132 Misc. 62, 229 N.Y.S. 62, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 Misc. 62 (American Surety Co. v. Loomis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Surety Co. v. Loomis, 132 Misc. 62, 229 N.Y.S. 62, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).

Opinion

Frankenthaler, J.

Even if it be assumed that the town of Babylon and county of Suffolk could validly assign the causes of action which accrued in their favor, it cannot be gainsaid that the receipt of a valuable consideration would be necessary to make the transfer effective. The complaint, however, fails to allege that anything was received in return for the assignment and for aught that appears in that pleading the transfer was a mere gratuity or donation. Applying the rule that any fan, reasonable and substantial doubt as to the power of a municipality must be resolved against its existence, the complaint would, therefore, appear to be insufficient. Its deficiencies cannot be cured by statements in plaintiff's bill of particulars. The contents of a bill of particulars may, it is true — as a result of admissions therein contained — under certain circumstances render an otherwise good complaint bad, but they can never make an otherwise bad complaint good. The motion to dismiss is granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days upon payment of ten dollars costs. Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karom v. Altarac
208 Misc. 919 (New York County Courts, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 Misc. 62, 229 N.Y.S. 62, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-surety-co-v-loomis-nysupct-1928.