American Surety Co. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.

149 Misc. 10, 266 N.Y.S. 531, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1324
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1932·Published

Opinion

Shientag, J.

Motion to vacate warrant of attachment and service of summons and complaint is granted. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 174. See Matter of Ulmann v. Thomas, 255 N. Y. 506; Holmes v. Camp, 219 id. 359, and First Nat. Bank v. Maine, 284 U. S. 312.) Section 917 of the Civil Practice Act is not here controlling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Surety Co. v. Kasco Mills, Inc., 149 Misc. 10, 266 N.Y.S. 531, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1324 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).

149 Misc. 10 (American Surety Co. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine
284 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Matter of Ulmann v. Thomas
175 N.E. 192 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)