American Surety Co. v. Castleberry

195 S.E. 590, 57 Ga. App. 402, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 612
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1938
Docket26633
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 195 S.E. 590 (American Surety Co. v. Castleberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Surety Co. v. Castleberry, 195 S.E. 590, 57 Ga. App. 402, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 612 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This is a compensation ease under the workmen’s compensation act, and there are only two questions for the determination of this’ court: 1. Was the decedent (Gordon Castle-berry), at the time of his death, the servant and employee of the W. L. Cobb Construction Company, or the servant and employee of the Ledbetter-Johnson Company? And, 2. Was any evidence adduced from which the inference could legitimately be drawn that the decedent’s death resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment ? While the evidence material to the determination of the first question was conflicting and, possibly, would have authorized a finding that Castleberry, at the time of his fatal accident, was the servant and employee of the Led-better-Johnson Company, it also supported the finding of the Department of Industrial Relations that he was at that time the servant and employee of the W. L. Cobb Construction Company. As to the second question: Under the undisputed evidence in the case the presumption arose that Castleberry was at the time in question engaged in his master’s business and within the scope of his employment; and that presumption was not overcome by any evidence adduced. See, in this connection, Gallagher v. Gunn, 16 Ga. App. 600 (85 S. E. 930). Moreover, the undisputed evidence, direct and circumstantial, together with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, were sufficient to authorize the Department of Industrial Relations to find that the decedent’s death was caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. It follows that the judge of the superior court did not err in affirming the award of said department.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Peck
200 S.E.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Conner
160 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Ocean Accident & Guarantee Co. v. Lovern
83 S.E.2d 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Fulmer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
68 S.E.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Fulmer
57 S.E.2d 865 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Travelers Insurance Company v. Curry
45 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 590, 57 Ga. App. 402, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-surety-co-v-castleberry-gactapp-1938.