American Surety Co. of New York v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co.

90 F. 773, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2535
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 28, 1898
DocketNo. 975
StatusPublished

This text of 90 F. 773 (American Surety Co. of New York v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Surety Co. of New York v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co., 90 F. 773, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2535 (circtdct 1898).

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Bill to foreclose a first mortgage. At least a portion of the property covered by said mortgage is the same as that in possession of the receiver appointed in the suit brought to foreclose a later mortgage to the Central Trust Company of New York. Central Trust Co. of New York v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co., 86 Fed. 35, 90 Fed. 584, 91 Fed.-. The parties to the latter suit demur on the ground that it does not appear that leave of the court to file said bill separately has been obtained. Counsel for demurrants claim that this is an independent bill, and that, as the property is in the hands of a receiver appointed by this court, and as the bill prays for a foreclosure, and seeks to interfere with the possession of the receiver, it cannot be maintained; citing the opinion of Judge Wheeler in American Loan & Trust Co. v. Central Vermont R. Co., 86 Fed. 390. If the decision of Judge Wheeler had covered the points involved in this case, I should follow it, but the cases are clearly distinguishable for the following reasons: In American Loan & Trust Co. v. Central Vermont R. Co., supra, the suit was independent. The receivers were not joined as parties, and no leave to so join them was obtained. Here the suit is not necessarily an independent one. The receiver is joined as defendant by leave of the court, and a decree would not necessarily disturb his possession. Let an order be entered overruling the demurrer and directing the defendant to answer within two weeks from the filing of this memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Trust Co. of New York v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co.
86 F. 35 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1898)
American Loan & Trust Co. v. Central Vermont R.
86 F. 390 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1898)
Central Trust Co. v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co.
90 F. 584 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 F. 773, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-surety-co-of-new-york-v-worcester-cycle-mfg-co-circtdct-1898.