American Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson

26 F.2d 248, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3654
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1928·No. No. 5324·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has petitioned for a rehearing upon two grounds: First, because the court did not consider or determine the effect of a preferred claim in the sum of $800 in favor of one Jeffries, arising out of a special deposit dissipated by the bank; and, second, because the court did not specify or define the issues to be retried. The first question was not considered or decided by the court below, and for that reason was not considered by this court, and the granting of a new trial reopens every issue in the case except as to questions definitely and finally determined by the appellate court.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson, 26 F.2d 248, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3654 (9th Cir. 1928).

26 F.2d 248 (American Surety Co. of New York v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood County
91 F.2d 665 (Fourth Circuit, 1937)