American Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Pinebrook Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Pinebrook Construction Corp.

24 A.D.2d 982, 265 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 982 (American Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Pinebrook Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Pinebrook Construction Corp., 24 A.D.2d 982, 265 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 26, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike certain written answers to interrogatories and directed additional answers thereto by defendant. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Plaintiff has already had a complete and full examination of defendant before trial. Therefore, it is unnecessary for defendant to be subjected to [983]*983further written interrogatories and answers on its part (Katz v. Posner, 23 A D 2d 774). TJghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 26, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike certain written answers to interrogatories and directed additional answers thereto by defendant. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Plaintiff has already had a complete and full examination of defendant before trial. Therefore, it is unnecessary for defendant to be subjected to [983]*983further written interrogatories and answers on its part (Katz v. Posner, 23 A D 2d 774). TJghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 982, 265 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-steel-fabricators-inc-v-pinebrook-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack