American Steel & Copper Plate Co. v. Bilter

200 Ill. App. 175
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 8, 1916
DocketGen. No. 6,162
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 Ill. App. 175 (American Steel & Copper Plate Co. v. Bilter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Steel & Copper Plate Co. v. Bilter, 200 Ill. App. 175 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Fraudulent conveyances, § 80*—what constitutes voluntary gift of property invalid in equity. The conveyance by a debtor of all his property to his children for a consideration, consisting of the assumption of all the debts of the grantor except one, which consideration is only about one-half the value of such property, constitutes a voluntary gift over to the assignees, and will be set aside in equity at the instance of such other creditor regardless of whether or not the grantees have knowledge of such other debt. 6. Fraudulent conveyances, § 87*—when no presumption as to lack of good faith arises from sale to relatives. A debtor in failing circumstances may convey his property to his relatives, and if there are no indications of fraud no presumption arises from the relationship. 7. Fraudulent conveyances, § 87*—when to be considered to impeach conveyance. The fact of relationship between an indebted grantor and the grantee of property may be considered with other evidence as tending to impeach the conveyance. 8. Fraudulent conveyances, § 65*—what is badge of fraud. Inadequacy of consideration for the conveyance of property by an indebted father to his children is a badge of fraud. 9. Appeal and error, § 365*—when grantee of property set aside as invalid against creditor not entitled to decree for reimbursement of consideration paid. A grantee of property which is set aside as invalid against creditors is not entitled to protection in equity for the payment of part of the consideration, where he fails to ask such protection from the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American State Bank v. Butts
191 P. 754 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 Ill. App. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-steel-copper-plate-co-v-bilter-illappct-1916.