American Snuff Co. v. Old Indian Snuff Mills

S.D. New York

American Snuff Co. v. Old Indian Snuff Mills

177 F. 1007, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5358

DecidedMarch 26, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. 1007 (American Snuff Co. v. Old Indian Snuff Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Snuff Co. v. Old Indian Snuff Mills, 177 F. 1007, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5358 (S.D.N.Y. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

In view of the conflicting affidavits, and of the decision in Weyman v. Soderberg, 108 Fed. 63, this case is too doubtful to warrant the issuance of a preliminary injunction. It cannot be said — to use the language of the complainant’s brief — that “there is no doubt as to the final outcome of the case” and that the “complainant is bound to succeed.” The motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

In view of the conflicting affidavits, and of the decision in Weyman v. Soderberg, 108 Fed. 63, this case is too doubtful to warrant the issuance of a preliminary injunction. It cannot be said — to use the language of the complainant’s brief — that “there is no doubt as to the final outcome of the case” and that the “complainant is bound to succeed.” The motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F. 1007, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-snuff-co-v-old-indian-snuff-mills-nysd-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack