American Slicing Mach. Co. v. Corkedale
149 N.Y.S. 1069, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 149 N.Y.S. 1069 (American Slicing Mach. Co. v. Corkedale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
American Slicing Mach. Co. v. Corkedale, 149 N.Y.S. 1069, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Although we have repeatedly called attention to the rule requiring appellant to state facts showing that the appeal is a meritorious one, there has been no attempt to comply with this rule. In addition, no excuse is offered for appellant’s laches. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
149 N.Y.S. 1069, 165 A.D. 922, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-slicing-mach-co-v-corkedale-nyappdiv-1914.