American Security Insurance v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Security Insurance v. Williams

79 A.D.2d 684, 436 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14066

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 684 (American Security Insurance v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Security Insurance v. Williams, 79 A.D.2d 684, 436 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a claim under an automobile insurance policy, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 3, 1980, that, upon respondent’s motion “to renew or reargue” petitioner’s application for a stay, which had resulted in a judgment dated March 6, 1980 granting the application, (1) granted the respondent’s motion, (2) vacated the judgment and (3) reinstated a prior order of the same court, dated September 25, 1979, that had granted a stay pending a trial inter alia on the issue of physical contact. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree with Special Term’s determination that respondent was covered under the main policy provisions of the contract of insurance, viz., the uninsured motorists indorsement, and that the matter should first proceed to trial on the issue of physical contact pursuant to the order dated September 25,1979. Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a claim under an automobile insurance policy, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 3, 1980, that, upon respondent’s motion “to renew or reargue” petitioner’s application for a stay, which had resulted in a judgment dated March 6, 1980 granting the application, (1) granted the respondent’s motion, (2) vacated the judgment and (3) reinstated a prior order of the same court, dated September 25, 1979, that had granted a stay pending a trial inter alia on the issue of physical contact. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree with Special Term’s determination that respondent was covered under the main policy provisions of the contract of insurance, viz., the uninsured motorists indorsement, and that the matter should first proceed to trial on the issue of physical contact pursuant to the order dated September 25,1979. Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 684, 436 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-security-insurance-v-williams-nyappdiv-1980.