American School-Furniture Co. v. Vaught
108 F. 571, 47 C.C.A. 496, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795
Opinion
The ap|>ellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because it is from an interlocutory order denying a preliminary injunction, and the counsel for the appellant has signified his consent that the motion be sustained. The appeal is therefore dismissed on the authority of Wire Co. v. Boyce (C. C. A.) 104 Fed. 172, and West-inghonse Air-Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co. (C. C. A.) 104 Fed. 622.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American School-Furniture Co. v. Vaught, 108 F. 571, 47 C.C.A. 496, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795 (7th Cir. 1901).
108 F. 571 (American School-Furniture Co. v. Vaught) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Columbia Wire Co. v. Boyce
104 F. 172 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)
Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.
104 F. 622 (Second Circuit, 1900)