American Rusch Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

American Rusch Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 58, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2281

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 31, 1967

DocketC.D. 3069

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 58 (American Rusch Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Rusch Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 58, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2281 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Judge:

These protests have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN COUNSEL, in the matter of the above protests, that the items marked “A” and initiated SJS (Examiner’s Initials) by Stanley J. Schwartz (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by said protests, which were assessed with duty at 12½% under Item 709.09, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, under the provision therein for catheters, in fact consist of Guedel Airways, which are breathing appliances; and that said Guedel Airways are not part of anesthetic apparatus, and do not employ an anesthetic when in use.

That the plaintiff claims that the said items are probably dutiable at 10% under Item 709.45 of said Act, and that said protests may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

■ The said protests are abandoned as to all items not marked “A” as above.

This undisputed statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification given by the collector and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiff, to be under item 709.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as breathing appliances, dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem. To. the extent indicated, the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered. accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Judge:

These protests have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN COUNSEL, in the matter of the above protests, that the items marked “A” and initiated SJS (Examiner’s Initials) by Stanley J. Schwartz (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by said protests, which were assessed with duty at 12½% under Item 709.09, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, under the provision therein for catheters, in fact consist of Guedel Airways, which are breathing appliances; and that said Guedel Airways are not part of anesthetic apparatus, and do not employ an anesthetic when in use.

That the plaintiff claims that the said items are probably dutiable at 10% under Item 709.45 of said Act, and that said protests may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

■ The said protests are abandoned as to all items not marked “A” as above.

This undisputed statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification given by the collector and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiff, to be under item 709.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as breathing appliances, dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem. To. the extent indicated, the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered. accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 58, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-rusch-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.