American Roll-Up Door Co. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

American Roll-Up Door Co. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

662 So. 2d 767, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11962, 1995 WL 676075

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2300

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 662 So. 2d 767 (American Roll-Up Door Co. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Roll-Up Door Co. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp., 662 So. 2d 767, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11962, 1995 WL 676075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed in the circuit court a complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on a claim for $4,592.00. The court entered summary judgment for the defendants on the holding that the circuit court was without subject matter jurisdiction. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Alexdex Corp. v. Nachon Enterprises, Inc., 641 So.2d 858 (Fla.1994), decided subsequent to the judgment entered in this case. Appellees, while conceding that the cited case is dispositive on the issue of the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, argue that the court correctly entered summary final judgment for defendants because of the other grounds upon which their motion was based. The court denied the motion on each of the other grounds on the finding that each involved factual issues, and we are not inclined, on this record, to disturb that ruling.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

STONE and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed in the circuit court a complaint to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on a claim for $4,592.00. The court entered summary judgment for the defendants on the holding that the circuit court was without subject matter jurisdiction. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Alexdex Corp. v. Nachon Enterprises, Inc., 641 So.2d 858 (Fla.1994), decided subsequent to the judgment entered in this case. Appellees, while conceding that the cited case is dispositive on the issue of the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, argue that the court correctly entered summary final judgment for defendants because of the other grounds upon which their motion was based. The court denied the motion on each of the other grounds on the finding that each involved factual issues, and we are not inclined, on this record, to disturb that ruling.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

STONE and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

662 So. 2d 767, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11962, 1995 WL 676075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-roll-up-door-co-v-chromalloy-gas-turbine-corp-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack