American Roland Corp. v. United States
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of thiamine hydrochloride, which merchandise was the subject of American Roland Corp. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 391, Reap. Dec. 10808), wherein the court found, based on facts agreed to by the Government, that the date of exportation of said merchandise covered by the involved entry (856931 of 11/20/62) was during the period November 9, 1962, to May 17,1963; that, in liquidation, the liquidating officer used a date of exportation other than that previously determined by the Government, resulting in a liquidation at a higher dutiable value than that determined by the court in Reap. Dec. 10808, supra; that a request for relief under the provisions of section 520(c) (1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to correct the inadvertence was denied and the protest herein was lodged against said denial; and that the proper duti[913]*913able values for the involved merchandise are as set forth in Eeap. Dec. 10808, supra, the court sustained the claim in the protest that the involved entry should be reliquidated on the basis of export value of U.S. $13 per kilogram, c.i.f.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 Cust. Ct. 912 (American Roland Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.