American River AG, Inc. v. Vestis Group

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 4, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-02203·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 AMERICAN RIVER, AG, INC., A No. 2:19-CV-02203-TLN-DB 10 California corporation,

11 Plaintiff, AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING 12 v. ORDER 13 VESTIS GROUP, an Illinois corporation, and CONSOLIDATED 14 MILL SUPPLY, INC., an Illinois corporation doing business as 15 VESTIS GROUP, 16 Defendants. 17 ______________________________

18 VESTIS GROUP, an Illinois 19 corporation, and CONSOLIDATED MILL SUPPLY, INC., an Illinois 20 corporation doing business as VESTIS GROUP, 21 Counter-claimants, 22

23 v.

24 AMERICAN RIVER, AG, INC., A California corporation, 25 Counter-defendant. 26 27 /// 28 1 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the Court 2 hereby amends the Pretrial Scheduling Order. 3 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 4 All named Defendants have been served and no further service 5 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been 6 shown. 7 II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS 8 No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is 9 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. 10 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE 11 Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Venue is 12 not disputed. 13 IV. DISCOVERY 14 All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall 15 be completed by May 20, 2022. In this context, “completed” means 16 that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all 17 depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to 18 discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if 19 necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 20 been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on 21 the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local 22 rules of this Court. 23 Any request to deviate from the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure should be made to the assigned Magistrate Judge. 25 V. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES 26 All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the 27 Court, and serve upon all other parties the name, address, and 28 area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at 1 trial not later than July 18, 2022.1 The designation shall be 2 accompanied by a written report prepared and signed by the 3 witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 26(a)(2)(B). 5 Within twenty (20) days after the designation of expert 6 witnesses, any party may designate a supplemental list of expert 7 witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an 8 expert designated by an adverse party. 9 The right to designate a supplemental expert for rebuttal 10 purposes only shall apply to a party who has not previously 11 disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness 12 disclosure by this Pretrial Scheduling Order. 13 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as 14 set forth above in all likelihood will preclude that party from 15 calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert 16 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to 17 testify unless the party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) 18 that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably 19 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the 20 Court and opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery 21 of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made 22 available for deposition. 23 For purposes of this Pretrial Scheduling Order, an “expert” 24 is any person who may be used at trial to present evidence under 25 Rules 702, 703, and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which 26 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their

27 1 The discovery of experts will include whether any motions based on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and/or Kumho Tire 28 Co. v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999) are anticipated. 1 expertise, have rendered expert opinions in the normal course of 2 their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the 3 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by 4 a party to be a testifying expert for the purposes of 5 litigation). 6 Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is 7 percipient, retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party 8 designating a retained expert has acquired the express permission 9 of the witness to be so listed. 10 Parties designating percipient experts must state in the 11 designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of 12 such persons. 13 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time 14 of designation to render an informed opinion, and give their 15 bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full 16 and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing 17 party. Experts will not be permitted to testify at the trial as 18 to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, 19 after deposition taken subsequent to designation. 20 Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert 21 witnesses in a timely manner in order to comply with the Court’s 22 deadline for filing dispositive motions. 23 VI. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e), the 25 parties shall exchange any supplemental disclosures and responses 26 (including expert supplemental materials) no later than thirty 27 (30) days prior to the dispositive motion hearing date. Any 28 supplemental disclosures and responses necessary after that date 1 will require leave of Court good cause having been shown. 2 VII. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 3 All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, 4 temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, 5 shall be heard no later than November 17, 2022. 6 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely 7 pretrial motions. Local Rule 230 governs the calendaring and 8 procedures of civil motions with the following additions: 9 (a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on 10 the day due; and 11 (b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls 12 on a legal holiday, the opposition brief shall be filed 13 on the last court day immediately preceding the legal 14 holiday. 15 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by 16 this order, may be deemed consent to the motion and the court may 17 dispose of the motion summarily. Further, failure to timely 18 oppose a summary judgment motion2 may result in the granting of 19 that motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to 20 demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact remains for 21 trial. 22 The Court places a page limit for points and authorities 23 (exclusive of exhibits and other supporting documentation) of 24 twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty (20) pages 25 on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for 26 page limit increases must be made in writing to the Court setting

27 2 The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 28 260. 1 forth any and all reasons for any increase in page limit at least 2 fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion. 3 For the Court’s convenience, citations to Supreme Court 4 cases should include parallel citations to the Supreme Court 5 Reporter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American River AG, Inc. v. Vestis Group, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

American River AG, Inc. v. Vestis Group (American River AG, Inc. v. Vestis Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1999)