American River AG., Inc. v. Global Natural, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 28, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-00377·Unknown

Opinion

AMERICAN RIVER AG. INC., No. 2:18-cv-00377-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. GLOBAL NATURAL, LLC, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a California Corporation, has filed this action alleging various breach of contract claims and a breach of express warranty claim against Defendants. On June 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations, filed June 10, 2020, are ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor and against Defendants. 4. Plaintiff is awarded $1,254,031.62 jointly and severally against Defendants Global Natural and Michael Spangler. 5. Plaintiff additionally is awarded $157,430.30 from Global Natural and $50,275.59 in prejudgment interest from Global Natural. 6. Costs against Defendants are assessed in the amount of $659.96. DATED: July 27, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American River AG., Inc. v. Global Natural, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

American River AG., Inc. v. Global Natural, LLC (American River AG., Inc. v. Global Natural, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)