American Rattan & Reed Manufacturing Co. v. Handel-Maatschappij Moraux & Co.

194 A.D. 975
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1920·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to set aside service of summons granted, with ten dollars costs. Upon the proof submitted to the Special Term, the persons served with the summons were not officers or agents of the defendant foreign corporation within section 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Riverside Mills v. Menefee, 237 U. S. 189; Dollar Co. v. Canadian C. & F. Co., 220 N. Y. 270; Coler v. P. B. Co., 146 id. 281; Josephy v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway, 180 App. Div. 314; Berner v. Collier Co., No. 1, 179 id. 732; Lanzner v. Allyne Brass Foundry Co., Id. 892.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Rattan & Reed Manufacturing Co. v. Handel-Maatschappij Moraux & Co., 194 A.D. 975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

194 A.D. 975 (American Rattan & Reed Manufacturing Co. v. Handel-Maatschappij Moraux & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. Menefee
237 U.S. 189 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.
115 N.E. 711 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)