American Railway Express Co. v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

American Railway Express Co. v. Willis

111 S.E. 580, 28 Ga. App. 430, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 570

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 1, 1922

Docket12929

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 580 (American Railway Express Co. v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Railway Express Co. v. Willis, 111 S.E. 580, 28 Ga. App. 430, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 570 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

“ A petition in an action of Hover which sets out a description of the property, and its value, title thereto in the plaintiff, possession in the defendant, and a refusal to deliver on demand, is good against general demurrer.” Bank of Sparta v. Butts, 1 Ga. App. 771 (1) (57 S. E. 1061).

2. A bailee may maintain an action of trover. Mitchell v. Georgia &c. Ry., 111 Ga. 760 (36 S. E. 971, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 622). See also, in this connection, Harpes v. Harpes, 62 Ga. 395.

3. The petition as amended having described the property and stated its value, and having alleged that the plaintiff was a common carrier, and that the goods described were regularly received into the possession of the plaintiff for transportation, and were delivered by mistake to the defendant, and that the defendant refused to deliver the goods on demand, the court erred in dismissing the petition on the ground that it was insufficient.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Robert C. Alston, W. V. Custer, for plaintiff in error. Hartsfield & Conger, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI