American Railway Express Co. v. Eddy

222 A.D. 840
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The justice had lost jurisdiction but the court had not. (Mosehauer v. Jenkins, 128 App. Div. 825.) The question of laches is not here considered for the reason that the plaintiff has not been heard on that subject by replying affidavits, the defendant having asked no affirmative relief. The defendant can bring up this question by motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman and Davis, JJ., concur; Whitmyer, J., dissents. Judgment of the County Court reversed on the law, with costs, and the order of the City Court reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Railway Express Co. v. Eddy, 222 A.D. 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

222 A.D. 840 (American Railway Express Co. v. Eddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Weitz
14 Misc. 2d 519 (New York County Courts, 1958)