American Railroad v. Richardson

D. Puerto Rico

American Railroad v. Richardson

6 P.R. Fed. 234

District Court, D. Puerto Rico·Decided June 26, 1913·No. Nos. 853, 940·Published

Opinion

HAMILTON, Judge,

delivered the following opinion:

The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is now raised in these cases for the first time, the Attorney General appearing specially in order to object to the jurisdiction of the court, filing a plea for that purpose, and moving to vacate the summons and dismiss the complaint. While the pleading is therefore different from the Fajardo Sugar Company Case, the other points raised are the same, and the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied upon the ground set out in the opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAMILTON, Judge,

delivered the following opinion:

The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is now raised in these cases for the first time, the Attorney General appearing specially in order to object to the jurisdiction of the court, filing a plea for that purpose, and moving to vacate the summons and dismiss the complaint. While the pleading is therefore different from the Fajardo Sugar Company Case, the other points raised are the same, and the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied upon the ground set out in the opinion in that case.

American Railroad v. Richardson, 6 P.R. Fed. 234 (prd 1913).

Pincite

6 P.R. Fed. 234 (American Railroad v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.