American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 31, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-0529
StatusPublished

This text of American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc. (American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc., (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AMERICAN PETROLEUM ) INSTITUTE, ) ) Plain tiff/C 0 un terclaim ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 09-529 (RJL) ) TECHNOMEDIA INTERNATIONAL, ) INC., ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim ) Plaintiff. )

ORDER fL.. ---- For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, it is this .:sUday of March, 2010, hereby

ORDERED that API's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1-3 and 5-6 of TechnoMedia's Amended Counterclaim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [#39] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is further

ORDERED that Count I of the Amended Counterclaim is DISMISSED with prejudice, except as to TechnoMedia's claim that API is wrongfully withholding TechnoMedia's trade secrets; it is further

ORDERED that Counts 2,3,5, and 6 of the Amended Counterclaim are DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further

ORDERED that API's Motion to Strike Allegations of the Amended Counterclaim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) [#39] is GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that all allegations in the Amended Counterclaim concerning any association between API and Ecoman or between API and the Islamic Republic of Iran- including, without limitation, the allegations contained at pages 1-2 and at paragraphs 30- 35, 77(d), 80(e), and 87 of the Amended Counterclaim-are hereby STRICKEN; it is further ORDERED that TechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary Injunction [#23] is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that TechnoMedia's Motion for Leave to File Deposition Transcript Excerpts of Patrick Quinn in Support of TechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary Injunction [#62] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

RICHA . EON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-petroleum-institute-v-technomedia-interna-dcd-2010.