American Oil Co. v. Moorehead
This text of 201 Ga. 607 (American Oil Co. v. Moorehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Injunctive relief is sought in this case to assist the plaintiff in the recovery of certain equipment allegedly loaned to the defendant under a written agreement which the [611]*611plaintiff had voluntarily canceled. All that is sought is to restrain the defendant from using the equipment and from interfering.with the plaintiff in its efforts to repossess.
It would appear from the proof that the plaintiff .has an adequate remedy at law. No insolvency of the defendant is alleged or proved. The plaintiff seeks to show irreparable damage by proof to the effect that equipment of the kind in question is extremely scarce, that the plaintiff is in dire need of the equipment, and it is “practically impossible” for the plaintiff to secure this type of equipment. This proof falls short of showing such facts as will make a case of irreparable injury and damage. Compare Imperial Hotel Company v. Martin, 199 Ga. 801 (35 S. E. 2d, 502). Accordingly, the plaintiff has failed to show that ample relief can not be had by the ordinary processes of law. See Dasher v. Schroer, 179 Ga. 88 (175 S. E. 382).
The trial court did not err in denying an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 Ga. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-oil-co-v-moorehead-ga-1946.