American National Insurance v. Lee

89 S.E. 836, 145 Ga. 797, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 482
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 12, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The so-called brief of evidence in this ease consists almost entirely of questions and answers, and contains certain objections to testimony and colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court; and no bona fide effort being made to brief the evidence, it will not be considered. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119); Crumbley v. Brook, 135 Ga. 723 (2), 726 (70 S. E. 655).

2. None of the errors assigned can be determined without reference to a brief of the evidence; and there being no proper brief .of the evidence, the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

By five Justices, all concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American National Insurance v. Lee, 89 S.E. 836, 145 Ga. 797, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 482 (Ga. 1916).

89 S.E. 836 (American National Insurance v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon
18 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Peek v. Irwin
139 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Clay v. Austell School District
136 S.E. 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Crump v. Farmer
115 S.E. 71 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)