American National Bank & Trust Company of Chattanooga v. Davis

245 S.E.2d 291, 241 Ga. 333, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 947
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1978
Docket33493
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 245 S.E.2d 291 (American National Bank & Trust Company of Chattanooga v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American National Bank & Trust Company of Chattanooga v. Davis, 245 S.E.2d 291, 241 Ga. 333, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 947 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

This is an action to set aside a deed for fraud upon a creditor. The trial court granted a motion to strike the defendant grantee for failure to state a claim against her. This is tantamount to dismissing the action because the grantee is an indispensable party. Czyz v. Czyz, 240 Ga. 806 (242 SE2d 585) (1978). We reverse.

A motion to dismiss a complaint should not be granted for failure to state a claim unless the complaint shows with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts that could be *334 proved in support of the claim. Here the plaintiff seeks to set aside a deed from the defendant son to the defendant mother. It is alleged that the plaintiff was a creditor of the son, he was insolvent at the time of the conveyance, the conveyance was voluntary, and the conveyance was fraudulent, and the mother had reasonable grounds of suspicion that the conveyance was fraudulent. These allegations state a claim. Code Ann. § 28-201. Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Aldridge, 233 Ga. 318 (210 SE2d 791) (1974).

Submitted April 14, 1978 Decided May 17, 1978. Brown, Harriss, Hartman & Ruskaup, Robert J. Harriss, for appellant. JohnW.Love, Jr., William M. Phillips, Carter School-field, for appellees.

The record here does not authorize the motion to dismiss to be treated as a motion for summary judgment. Appellee contends the trial judge based his decision upon certain stipulations but appellant disputes this and no such stipulations appear of record nor is reference made thereto in the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Caldeira
768 A.2d 782 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Argonaut Insurance v. Atlantic Wood Industries, Inc.
370 S.E.2d 765 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Allstate Insurance v. Shuman
293 S.E.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Property Pickup, Inc. v. Morgan
290 S.E.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
INSILCO CORPORATION v. First National Bank of Dalton
283 S.E.2d 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Holmes v. Worthey
282 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
West v. Sprayberry
275 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Goldberg v. Black
275 S.E.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Goodman v. City of Atlanta
268 S.E.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.E.2d 291, 241 Ga. 333, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-national-bank-trust-company-of-chattanooga-v-davis-ga-1978.