American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Byrd

Mississippi Supreme Court

American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Byrd

3 So. 2d 850, 191 Miss. 457, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 174

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1941

DocketNo. 34666.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 So. 2d 850 (American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Byrd, 3 So. 2d 850, 191 Miss. 457, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 174 (Mich. 1941).

Pincite

Opinions

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence was sufficient to establish these facts: That appellant made no objection to the manner of making’ the first five monthly payments nor the delay in making them. It thereby ratified that course of dealing. For that reason,. the appellant had uo right to declare the entire indebtedness due and demand payment therefor on account of the delay in making the sixth monthly payment without having previously notified appellee it would *468 demand that payment on time. That was not done according to the evidence for appellee. In fact, there was little, if any, substantial conflict in the evidence as to those facts. With that sort of a case appellant showed a reckless disregard of appellee’s rights in undertaking to declare the whole indebtedness due and payable, and bringing replevin.

However, the verdict of the jury in appellee’s favor for $500 damages ought not to stand under the evidence. It was all punitive. That was too .much punishment in a case where there was less than $300' involved.

If appellee will enter a remittitur for $350' the judgment will be affirmed. Otherwise, it will be reversed and remanded to be tried alone on the question of damages.

Affirmed with remittitur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence was sufficient to establish these facts: That appellant made no objection to the manner of making’ the first five monthly payments nor the delay in making them. It thereby ratified that course of dealing. For that reason,. the appellant had uo right to declare the entire indebtedness due and demand payment therefor on account of the delay in making the sixth monthly payment without having previously notified appellee it would *468 demand that payment on time. That was not done according to the evidence for appellee. In fact, there was little, if any, substantial conflict in the evidence as to those facts. With that sort of a case appellant showed a reckless disregard of appellee’s rights in undertaking to declare the whole indebtedness due and payable, and bringing replevin.

However, the verdict of the jury in appellee’s favor for $500 damages ought not to stand under the evidence. It was all punitive. That was too .much punishment in a case where there was less than $300' involved.

If appellee will enter a remittitur for $350' the judgment will be affirmed. Otherwise, it will be reversed and remanded to be tried alone on the question of damages.

Affirmed with remittitur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 So. 2d 850, 191 Miss. 457, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-nat-bank-trust-co-v-byrd-miss-1941.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack