American Nat. Bank of Pawhuska, Okla. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

American Nat. Bank of Pawhuska, Okla. v. Rogers

1937 OK 696, 74 P.2d 116, 181 Okla. 391, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 177

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 7, 1937

DocketNo. 27878.

StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK 696 (American Nat. Bank of Pawhuska, Okla. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Nat. Bank of Pawhuska, Okla. v. Rogers, 1937 OK 696, 74 P.2d 116, 181 Okla. 391, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 177 (Okla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition in error with case-made attached was filed April 29, 1937, and a motion to dismiss has been filed under date of July 19, 1937, for the reason and on the ground that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only. On September 21, 1937, this court entered its order directing the plaintiff in error to respond to the motion to dismiss, and no response has been filed and no excuse has been offered for such failure. We have held under such circumstances that this court may in its discretion dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAYISON. JJ., concur. BAYLESS, Y. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition in error with case-made attached was filed April 29, 1937, and a motion to dismiss has been filed under date of July 19, 1937, for the reason and on the ground that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only. On September 21, 1937, this court entered its order directing the plaintiff in error to respond to the motion to dismiss, and no response has been filed and no excuse has been offered for such failure. We have held under such circumstances that this court may in its discretion dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAYISON. JJ., concur. BAYLESS, Y. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1937 OK 696, 74 P.2d 116, 181 Okla. 391, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-nat-bank-of-pawhuska-okla-v-rogers-okla-1937.