American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Bova

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Bova

32 A.D.2d 527, 300 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 527 (American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Bova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Bova, 32 A.D.2d 527, 300 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered 'September 17, 1968 denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. The court notes, however, that the record discloses no reason why the suit herein — to recover the sum of $1,886.91—was not commenced in the ,Civil Court. The case is therefore remanded to Special Term for the purpose of transferring the action to the Civil Court unless plaintiff advances a proper reason for retaining jurisdiction in the Supreme Court. (Midtown Commercial Corp. v. Kelner, 29 A D 2d 349, 351; Trussell v. Strongo, 29 A D 2d 851; N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 19, subd. a). Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, MeGivern, Markewieh and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered 'September 17, 1968 denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. The court notes, however, that the record discloses no reason why the suit herein — to recover the sum of $1,886.91—was not commenced in the ,Civil Court. The case is therefore remanded to Special Term for the purpose of transferring the action to the Civil Court unless plaintiff advances a proper reason for retaining jurisdiction in the Supreme Court. (Midtown Commercial Corp. v. Kelner, 29 A D 2d 349, 351; Trussell v. Strongo, 29 A D 2d 851; N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 19, subd. a). Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, MeGivern, Markewieh and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 527, 300 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-mutual-liability-insurance-v-bova-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack