American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston, and Warayne B. Denney v. Selected Risks Insurance Company, a Corporation

Fourth Circuit

American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston, and Warayne B. Denney v. Selected Risks Insurance Company, a Corporation

424 F.2d 553, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9270

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1970

Docket13700

StatusPublished

This text of 424 F.2d 553 (American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston, and Warayne B. Denney v. Selected Risks Insurance Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston, and Warayne B. Denney v. Selected Risks Insurance Company, a Corporation, 424 F.2d 553, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9270 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The controversy here revolves around the cancellation of an automobile liability insurance policy because of an alleged material misrepresentation of fact in the application of Warayne B. Denney for the policy issued to him by Selected Risks Insurance Company.

The district court found that there was a misrepresentation of fact in the application, that the misrepresentation was material, that it was knowingly made, and that Selected Risks had not waived its right to cancel the policy by failing to give timely notice to the insured of its intention to do so.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The controversy here revolves around the cancellation of an automobile liability insurance policy because of an alleged material misrepresentation of fact in the application of Warayne B. Denney for the policy issued to him by Selected Risks Insurance Company.

The district court found that there was a misrepresentation of fact in the application, that the misrepresentation was material, that it was knowingly made, and that Selected Risks had not waived its right to cancel the policy by failing to give timely notice to the insured of its intention to do so.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 F.2d 553, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-mutual-insurance-company-of-boston-and-warayne-b-denney-v-ca4-1970.