American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Patrick

453 So. 2d 424, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1984
DocketNos. AV-287, AV-288
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 424 (American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Patrick, 453 So. 2d 424, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The employer/carrier and the Special Disability Trust Fund appeal the deputy commissioner’s order directing them to pay to claimant a lump sum advance of all future compensation benefits commuted to a present value of $103,700. The E/C raise three points for our review: (1) whether the lump sum advance is in claimant’s best interest; (2) whether the $7,500 cap appearing in section 440.20(13)(d), Florida Statutes [425]*425(1983), applies to the instant award; and (3) whether the 8 percent discount rate appearing in section 440.20(12)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), applies to the instant award. We affirm.

Points II and III were decided adversely to appellants’ position in our very recent decision in Cone Brothers Contracting v. Gordon, 453 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The 1983 amendments to sections 440.20(12) and 440.20(13), Florida Statutes (1979) are substantive and are to be applied prospectively only.1

Resolution of Point I is also controlled by the Gordon decision; although we note that on these facts, where the periodic payments left claimant in utter penury once daily living expenses were met, we feel even more compelled to affirm the lump sum award.

The financial plan introduced by claimant is sound and comprehensive, and would undeniably be in his best interests. However, we would amend the deputy’s order to add the proviso that the $103,700 lump sum received by claimant be utilized only for those purposes as set forth in the investment plan prepared by financial consultant Henry L. Turner, III, and in the testimony.

AFFIRMED, as amended.

MILLS and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JENSEN CONST. CO. v. Sowers
480 So. 2d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Crosby
481 So. 2d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 424, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-mutual-insurance-co-v-patrick-fladistctapp-1984.