American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Henderson

141 F.2d 813, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367, 1944 A.M.C. 874
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 1944
DocketNo. 10792
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 141 F.2d 813 (American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Henderson, 141 F.2d 813, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367, 1944 A.M.C. 874 (5th Cir. 1944).

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal challenges the correctness of an award of compensation made under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of 1927, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., to Inell Berthy, whose husband died of injuries sustained as an employee of Ryan Stevedoring Company, Inc. The single question presented is whether there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the Deputy Commissioner that Inell Berthy was living apart from her husband for justifiable cause or by reason of his desertion at the time of his death.1

The evidence is clear that Inell Berthy and the decedent were married December 5, 1923, and lived together for several months; that in March, 1924, her husband deserted her, and refused thereafter to live with her or to support her; that no divorce was ever obtained; and that in 1925 Inell Berthy began living with Emile Alexander, to whom she ultimately bore five children and with whom she still was living at the time this case was tried.

Although the original separation was due solely to her husband’s desertion, and her living apart was then for justifiable cause, her later act in living with and bearing children to another man was done of her [814]*814own free will, was in derogation of her relationship as the lawful wife of Berthy, and became the independent cause of her living apart from her husband at the time of his death.

As this court held in the recent case of Ryan Stevedoring Company v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 138 F.2d 348, this new and independent reason for her living apart from her husband operated as a matter of law to forfeit any and all rights of the wife as a claimant of compensation under the Act.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Donovan
218 F.2d 860 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. P. J. Donovan
218 F.2d 860 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)
Thompson v. Lawson
347 U.S. 334 (Supreme Court, 1954)
Thompson v. Lawson
205 F.2d 527 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Henderson v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc.
204 F.2d 178 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury
169 F.2d 988 (Ninth Circuit, 1948)
Delta Stevedoring Co. v. Henderson
168 F.2d 872 (Fifth Circuit, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F.2d 813, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367, 1944 A.M.C. 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-mut-liability-ins-v-henderson-ca5-1944.