American Motorists Insurance v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Motorists Insurance v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

212 A.D.2d 653, 624 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 653 (American Motorists Insurance v. Getty Petroleum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Motorists Insurance v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 212 A.D.2d 653, 624 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for property damage, the defendant Getty Petroleum Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 21, 1993, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $50,573.73 and in favor of the defendants Anthony Nunno and Leewood Service Station, Inc., dismissing its cross claims against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated in Leone v Leewood Serv. Sta. (212 AD2d 669 [decided herewith]). Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for property damage, the defendant Getty Petroleum Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 21, 1993, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $50,573.73 and in favor of the defendants Anthony Nunno and Leewood Service Station, Inc., dismissing its cross claims against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated in Leone v Leewood Serv. Sta. (212 AD2d 669 [decided herewith]). Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 653, 624 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-motorists-insurance-v-getty-petroleum-corp-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack