American Motorists Insurance v. Bennett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

American Motorists Insurance v. Bennett

415 So. 2d 897, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20472

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1982

DocketNo. 81-818

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 415 So. 2d 897 (American Motorists Insurance v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Motorists Insurance v. Bennett, 415 So. 2d 897, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting each of the insurer’s points on appeal, we find no error in the trial court’s entry of summary judgment that the applicable uninsured motorist limits were $1,000,000, the amount of the underlying liability coverage, Travelers Ins. Co. v. Spencer, 397 So.2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ellison v. Anderson, 74 So.2d 680 (Fla.1954); Inman v. Club on Sailboat Key, Inc., 342 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); or its submission to the jury of the issue of whether the plaintiff was a resident of the household of his father, the named insured, and was thus an additional insured under the applicable policy. See General Guaranty Ins. Co. v. Broxsie, 239 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Elkins, 52 Cal.App.3d 534, 125 Cal.Rptr. 139 (1975); see generally, Puente v. Arroyo, 366 So.2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 75 (Fla.1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rejecting each of the insurer’s points on appeal, we find no error in the trial court’s entry of summary judgment that the applicable uninsured motorist limits were $1,000,000, the amount of the underlying liability coverage, Travelers Ins. Co. v. Spencer, 397 So.2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ellison v. Anderson, 74 So.2d 680 (Fla.1954); Inman v. Club on Sailboat Key, Inc., 342 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); or its submission to the jury of the issue of whether the plaintiff was a resident of the household of his father, the named insured, and was thus an additional insured under the applicable policy. See General Guaranty Ins. Co. v. Broxsie, 239 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Elkins, 52 Cal.App.3d 534, 125 Cal.Rptr. 139 (1975); see generally, Puente v. Arroyo, 366 So.2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 75 (Fla.1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 So. 2d 897, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-motorists-insurance-v-bennett-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack