American Motorists Insurance Company v. Leonard A. Cohen and Gerda Cohen

Fifth Circuit

American Motorists Insurance Company v. Leonard A. Cohen and Gerda Cohen

358 F.2d 730, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6762

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 1966

Docket21771_1

StatusPublished

This text of 358 F.2d 730 (American Motorists Insurance Company v. Leonard A. Cohen and Gerda Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Motorists Insurance Company v. Leonard A. Cohen and Gerda Cohen, 358 F.2d 730, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6762 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Whether a certain policy of insurance was in effect at the time of a fire loss was the primary issue in this litigation, with secondary questions as to (a) failure to file proof of loss statements and (b) the extent of the loss incurred. The case was tried to the Court without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment for the appellees on all points.

A careful consideration of the record, briefs, and able arguments of counsel, including errors assigned as to the admission of proof, has produced no justification for a holding here that the action below was clearly erroneous.

It necessarily follows that the Judgment must be and is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Whether a certain policy of insurance was in effect at the time of a fire loss was the primary issue in this litigation, with secondary questions as to (a) failure to file proof of loss statements and (b) the extent of the loss incurred. The case was tried to the Court without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment for the appellees on all points.

A careful consideration of the record, briefs, and able arguments of counsel, including errors assigned as to the admission of proof, has produced no justification for a holding here that the action below was clearly erroneous.

It necessarily follows that the Judgment must be and is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 F.2d 730, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-motorists-insurance-company-v-leonard-a-cohen-and-gerda-cohen-ca5-1966.