American Mortgage Corp. v. Lord

253 So. 2d 922, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5961
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1971·No. No. 70-625·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to demonstrate any error to which timely objection was made in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See F.A.R. 3.3, 32 F.S.A.; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals § 205. Cf. Roe v. Henderson, 1939, 139 Fla. 386, 190 So. 618.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Mortgage Corp. v. Lord, 253 So. 2d 922, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

253 So. 2d 922 (American Mortgage Corp. v. Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. Roth
393 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
American Mortgage Corp. v. Lord
260 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)